Free Software For Selling Photos Online
Canon 5D MK II , Nikon D700, Nikon D3, Nikon D3X, Canon 1Ds MK III, Sony Alpha 900 full-framers and the majority of APS-C sized DSLRs – incorrect ISO!
Do you remember Mason Resnick from Popular Photography? I do. I enjoyed his articles in PopPhoto for years.
Mason is now an Editor for Adorama Learning Center and he has conducted a full-frame DSLRs research taking in the lab all 6 modern DSLRs: Canon 1Ds Mark III, Canon 5D Mark II, Nikon D3X, Nikon D3, Nikon D700 and Sony Alpha 900. According to his findings, all full framers have inaccurate ISO settings!
In a nutshell, the actual ISO measurements results vs. “official” ISO setting for the full-framers look as follow:
| Model | Actual ISO | ISO values ‘Manufacturer’->’Measured’ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Canon 1Ds MK III | consistently at around half a stop lower than the indicated speed | 100->73, 200->144, 400->285, 800->578, 1600->1171, 3200-2166 | |
| Canon 5D MK II | 1/4-1/3 less than reported by Canon | 100->73, 200->143, 400->285, 800->564 and the highest 25,600->15,110 only! | |
| Nikon D3X | I was amazed to learn that ISO 50 in D3X is not a real thing! It seems to be an in camera post processing for ISO 100 (both 50 & 100 were measured as ISO 78)! ISO 200 to 1600: 1/4 less than reported by Nikon; ISO 3200-6400 – 1/3 underexposure | 50->78, 100->78, 200-170, 400->337, 800->674, 1600->1369 | |
| Nikon D3 | consistent 1/3 underexposure | 200->161, 400->326, 800->635, 25,600->15,134 | |
| Nikon D700 | consistent 1/3 underexposure, not including high ISO | 200->162, 400->327, 800->651, 1600->1277, 25,000->14,085 only | |
| Sony Alpha 900 | consistent 1/3 underexposure, excluding ISO 100->119 – a 1/5 stop overexposure! | 200->151, 400->303, etc with 30% less | |
Want to review ISO measurement results for APS-C sized DSLRs like EOS 50D/40D/30D/20D, Nikon D90/D300/D200 and others?
Read this article by Mason Resnick
More From prostockmaster
| Print article | This entry was posted by David Mail on January 29, 2009 at 20:12, and is filed under Stock Photography. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback from your own site. |
























about 2 years ago
Not really new, iso hasn’t ever been that accurate going back to the film days, the only reason to concern yourself is if you use a separate lightmeter and its never been a secret that the iso 50 settings are expanded.
It’d be foolish to assume that our made to cost dslr cameras are anywhere near as accurate as a precision light measuring tool. I’ve no idea what sort of sample variation you’d get from body to body either since dxo dont give too many details on the tests.
To quote from Masons article “While this information may be surprising, it’s not really a big deal, because it is so easy to overcome”