Free Software For Selling Photography Online
iStockphoto requires you to delete images in your portfolio. Otherwise…
Here is the email I just have received from iStockphoto.com:
Standards at iStockphoto are always evolving. Our team of editors has been examining the collection and have decided that your image no longer meets our current standards. We understand that no one wants to lose an image from their portfolio, but we think that the rest of your work is much better.
You have two options. You may deactivate the image now. Or you may leave it in our Dollar Bin. The Dollar Bin is a collection of images with similar legacy quality issues. Every file in the Bin is available for one credit at any size. Images remain in the bin for four weeks after their last download, at which point they are automatically deactivated. It’s a way of giving the image a last chance before finally removing it.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please address them to support@istockphoto.com
Go here if you like to deactivate your image:
http://www.istockphoto.com//file_closeup.php?id=XXXXXX
http://www.istockphoto.com//file_closeup.php?id=YYYYYY
Best Regards,
iStockphoto.com
Let me read you what is written in this message.
iStockphoto is just too good for your images. You either remove them or you remove them. If you do not like this choice we will remove them on our own.
Now, please tell me who was the marketing genius behind this correspondence. I just want to shake his (her?) hand. I am sure that anyone who got such a message feels upset after reading it.
So, iStockphoto wants to keep their microstock collection ‘clean’, containing only brilliant images. I see. No doubt this is a good target iStock should aim to. I just wonder why this stock photography agency prefer to lose money instead of making it, sending messages like this one above to tens thousands microstock contributors. Any iStocker will be shocked reading this text exactly like I was.
How much did you guys cost to bring in a new contributor who generates some sales? Now take this cost and multiply it by the number of photographers that will leave you now – this is the cost of such a marketing communication. I will not be surprised if many microstock shooters will just stop submitting their stock photos to iStock, which appears to be too good for their artwork, preferring submitting stock images to other microstock agencies that treat their contributing stock photographers differently.
Bravo iStock! – good work, great marketing, refreshing approach to the customers relationship. Thumbs up!
I especially loved “You have two options.” quote. I see it this way:
One dark night you meet a robber. He points his gun on you and says:
“You have two options. You either give me your money and then I kill you or I first kill you and then I take your money.”
Being a good iStockphoto marketing person, the robber continues: “Do not you worry, my friend. The choice is yours!”.
And being polite the robber adds what iStock completely missed: “Oh, and thank you for doing business with us!”.
In a short time after this post has been published I got a personal message from iStockphoto staff, saying that the email discussed in this post was sent out by a mistake and they apologize for the misunderstanding.
According to iStock, what should be sent out was this message:
An image of yours has been moved to the iStockphoto Dollar Bin.
You have two options:
1. Deactivate the image
or
2. Leave it in the Dollar Bin
The Dollar Bin is a collection of images available to our clients from one to seven credits, depending on size. We feel the Dollar Bin provides another chance for the file to be downloaded… at a lower price.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please address them to artists@istockphoto.com
Click here to deactivate your image: http://www.istockphoto.com//file_closeup.php?id=xxxxxxx
Best Regards,
iStockphoto.com
Well, first I appreciate iStockphoto ability to react extremely fast. They understood their mistake and tried to fix it.
Obviously, this is a very different message to a contributor. There is no single word about image removals!
Mark Dennis, iStock commented out what happened with their Dollar Bin initiative at last: So the gremlins got into the auto email system again, and some people got an email saying that the files will be deleted after 30 days if they’re not selling.
Well, it seems that these gremlins, goblins and trolls were quite human and very intelligent, and really enjoyed what they did to the company, these cute little pets of iStockphoto.
I would suggest iStock to take the entire gremlins family out of the iStock email system once and forever. And please deduct the damages costs from the gremlins salary, just as a “lessons learned” action. Typically, it works at its best avoiding further similar communication with the customers.
More From prostockmaster
| Print article | This entry was posted by David Mail on November 19, 2009 at 17:24, and is filed under iStockphoto, Stock Photography. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback from your own site. |

















about 3 years ago
Are you done crying that one or two of your images are getting the boot, ProStockMaster? Need a tissue?
about 3 years ago
Dear Rich,
I am affraid I did not put myself clear enough on this matter.
I am not talking about a couple of my images.
I am talking here about iStockphoto’ attitude to their contributors. This is in fact what that email was about.
And I explained above what I think about such an attitude.
about 3 years ago
I think their “attitude” is very professional. If you want some of your less than desirable images to have a chance to be sold. Sell them on Fotolia where crappy images and copyright issues run free.
about 2 years ago
I got the same message from iStock. I wasn’t offended as they were all old files that had never sold. I don’t blame them really. Besides, they have done a lot worse stuff than this. I have my ups and downs with them but they remain my best source for sales.
about 2 years ago
@Rich
As far as I saw Fotolia manages a good collection of images, on par with any other top microstock. Is there any specific copyright issue with their images that you can point me on?
about 2 years ago
The largest area of issue I have seen at Fotolia is in the images of cars. Do you think Ferrari, Lamborghini, Mercedes etc. would appreciate people selling/profiting from images of their very expensive copyright cars? Is this not in violation?
about 2 years ago
I’m with David here,
My main source of income-and has been for the past 20 odd years – as a Management & Training Consultant specialising in Marketing. Photography has always been a second string.
If I had to work with iStock, and the above was an example of how the management team handled their communication with their contributors, I would be seriously worried. There can be no excuses for such ‘so called’ errors of communication, quote “the email discussed in this post was sent out by a mistake and they apologize for the misunderstanding.”
First impressions normally will account for 90+% of the recipients perception at that time. If I had received the email, I would have cancelled my account with them immediately, based upon that email, and I’m sure that many photographers will. (Unless they are the great unwashed suppliers of digital diarrhoea that is being thrown up by the digital revolution).
iStock need to get a grip and start acting like a ‘professional company’ you know the type, the sort of company that has managers who know how to manage and how to train their staff etc. And how to communicate effectively. Does anyone remember the Gerald Ratner story of how he single handily demolished his company by calling their product ‘crap’ in a speech he was giving at a private dinner?
about 1 year ago
I finally decided to remove all my images from Istock, and also not to buy anymore images. Allthough I never got any rejected files, I wasn’t happy with the ranking in their searchengine and the royalties they pay to contributors, it’s a shame.
Since Istock became part of the Getty Images, they only became more expensive for everybody who buys images. So, that isn’t it worth either.
about 1 year ago
Pssst. they don’t pay a lot anyway. Look into the other sites where photographers aren’t taken advantage of by making only 20% vs. 50% from other popular photo sites.